We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Chronovisor?

By G. Melanson
Updated Mar 06, 2024
Our promise to you
CulturalWorld is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At CulturalWorld, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

According to French priest and paranormal author, François Brune, the Chronovisor was a device owned by the Vatican which allowed people to view events in the past or future. Brune’s 2002 book, “The Vatican’s New Mystery” alleges that the Chronovisor was built in the 1950s by Italian scientist and priest, Father Pellegrino Maria Ernetti (1925-1994), along with twelve world-renowned scientists. Among the scientists named by Father Ernetti, were Nobel Laureate and physicist Enrico Fermi, and rocket scientist Wernher von Braun.

The Chronovisor has been described as a large cabinet with antennae made from alloys of unknown metals, a connected cathode ray tube, and a control panel of buttons and levers. According to “The Vatican’s New Mystery”, Father Ernetti claimed that the Chronovisor could be programmed to view and record specific times, locations, and even people in the past or future. Father Ernetti further claimed that the Chronovisor functioned by processing electromagnetic radiation residue from past events.

Father Ernetti purported to have personally seen a number of important historical events with the Chronovisor, the most notable being the crucifixion of Christ. In 1972, the May issue of Italian weekly news magazine, “La Domenica del Corriere” (Courier's Sunday), published a photo depicting the crucifixion and claimed that it had been taken with the Chronovisor. Father Ernetti denied this, citing the photo’s clarity and proximity as uncharacteristic of the Chronovisor’s photographic capabilities. The photo later revealed to be strikingly similar to a reverse-image of a wood carving by sculptor, Cullot Valera.

In addition to the crucifixion and a speech given by Napoleon Bonaparte, Father Ernetti also claimed to have seen a 169 BC production of the tragedy, “Thyestes”, which has been considered a lost work in modern times as only a few fragments of the text remain intact. Father Ernetti claimed to have reconstructed the entire text, which was later translated to English by Princeton University professor, Dr. Katherine Owen Eldred. Eldred noted in her analysis that she believed Ernetti had written the play himself rather than transcribing an original performance.

In a 2003 interview, François Brune relayed that a few months prior to Father Ernetti’s death in 1994, Ernetti told him that he had just partaken in a meeting at the Vatican with the last remaining scientists who worked on the Chronovisor. According to Father Ernetti via Brune, the Chronovisor had been dismantled by that time. On his death bed, Father Ernetti reportedly recanted his claims of the Chronovisor; however, Brune theorized that Ernetti was coerced into making a false confession.

CulturalWorld is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments

By anon1005179 — On Jul 05, 2021

There is no machine. Jesus is the real deal. I speak to him every day and God and they do listen. They prove it every morning with every breath I take. Praise the Lord and his son Jesus for all eternity.

By anon1004066 — On Nov 08, 2020

From another article, one about the secret contents of the Vatican archives, it is apparent that either the Vatican enjoys playing practical jokes on people raised on Dan Brown books, or certain individuals visiting said archives decided to make a buck off of fantastical stories of mysterious artifacts. Either way it's a hoax. The Vatican archives supposedly contain evidence that Jesus was not crucified, and Jesus' actual wooden cross as well; elongated skulls of aliens thoroughly debunked years ago; and this Chronovisor which has been dismantled for no apparent reason other than to keep investigators from concluding that it was a hoax.

By anon994454 — On Feb 10, 2016

I saw that image of Jesus Christ, but where are the thorns on the head, if it was taken during the time of the crucifixion.

By anon198285 — On Jul 19, 2011

I heard and read about this machine years ago, but beyond the fact this could be true or false, in the text above there is an apparent contradiction when it says the device could be programmed to view even people in the past or future, and then says it works by processing electromagnetic radiation residue from past events.

So if it works processing radiation residue from the past, how can then, view events from the future? For this happen it has to be with residues from the future too, right?

I can accept (and really believed that has existed, like many other devices that people are absolutely ignorant about) a machine to view the past, but future is a totally different matter and far more complex.

By anon193702 — On Jul 05, 2011

Not to sound judgemental or anything, but the church is or was against science. If you look at The Illuminati, that is science vs religion. The Catholic Church vs scientists, ergo The Vatican vs scientistd. This doesn't make any sense.

By anon73351 — On Mar 26, 2010

Why would the church dismantle this device? Are there any facts to prove this truly existed?

CulturalWorld, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

CulturalWorld, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.